Suche

OGH

OGH · 7Ob539/90; 4Ob11/91; 6Ob12/91; 3Ob2417/96d; 6Ob120/97h; 6Ob201/97w; 9ObA412/97x; 9ObA17/98k; 8ObA2344/96f; 6Ob330/98t; 8Ob190/98v; 4Ob308/99v; 8Ob348/99f; 1Ob120/00d; 6Ob208/00g; 7Ob23/01k; 1Ob22/01v; 6Ob19/01i; 1Ob126/01p; 6Ob183/01g; 9ObA212/01v; 3Ob314/01z; 9ObA95/02i; 6Ob262/02a; 4Ob57/03s; 8ObA47/04a; 7Ob116/05t; 6Ob13/06i; 3Ob32/06m; 8ObA46/06g; 6Ob182/06t; 1Ob166/06b; 4Ob213/06m; 3Ob113/07z; 8ObA72/07g; 9Ob29/07s; 6Ob105/08x; 2Ob166/08p; 5Ob168/08d; 1Ob254/09y; 3Ob14/11x; 13Os45/12k; 6Ob246/12p; 7Ob55/14k (7Ob56/14g); 6Ob178/14s; 6Ob136/15s; 3Ob111/19y; 9ObA137/19s; 3Ob47/20p; 6Ob118/20a; 6Ob191/21p; 1Ob242/22b; 6Ob244/22h; 6Ob41/24h; 6Ob92/25k · 3. Juli 2025

Veröff: GesRZ 1990,95 = ecolex 1990,417 = WBl 1990,278 = RdW 1990,343 nur: Nach herrschender Ansicht wirkt die Löschung nur deklarativ; die Gesellschaft besteht solange fort, als noch Aktivvermögen vorhanden ist. (T1) Veröff: SZ 64/134 = GesRZ 1992,132...

Rechtssatz3. Juli 2025ECLI:AT:OGH0002:1990:RS0050186

Original im RIS öffnen · PDF

Quelle: Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS). Die lokale Darstellung, Verlinkungen und Kontextangaben dienen der Orientierung und ersetzen keine juristische Prüfung.

Entscheidung

OGH · 7Ob539/90; 4Ob11/91; 6Ob12/91; 3Ob2417/96d; 6Ob120/97h; 6Ob201/97w; 9ObA412/97x; 9ObA17/98k; 8ObA2344/96f; 6Ob330/98t; 8Ob190/98v; 4Ob308/99v; 8Ob348/99f; 1Ob120/00d; 6Ob208/00g; 7Ob23/01k; 1Ob22/01v; 6Ob19/01i; 1Ob126/01p; 6Ob183/01g; 9ObA212/01v; 3Ob314/01z; 9ObA95/02i; 6Ob262/02a; 4Ob57/03s; 8ObA47/04a; 7Ob116/05t; 6Ob13/06i; 3Ob32/06m; 8ObA46/06g; 6Ob182/06t; 1Ob166/06b; 4Ob213/06m; 3Ob113/07z; 8ObA72/07g; 9Ob29/07s; 6Ob105/08x; 2Ob166/08p; 5Ob168/08d; 1Ob254/09y; 3Ob14/11x; 13Os45/12k; 6Ob246/12p; 7Ob55/14k (7Ob56/14g); 6Ob178/14s; 6Ob136/15s; 3Ob111/19y; 9ObA137/19s; 3Ob47/20p; 6Ob118/20a; 6Ob191/21p; 1Ob242/22b; 6Ob244/22h; 6Ob41/24h; 6Ob92/25k · 3. Juli 2025

7Ob539/90; 4Ob11/91; 6Ob12/91; 3Ob2417/96d; 6Ob120/97h; 6Ob201/97w; 9ObA412/97x; 9ObA17/98k; 8ObA2344/96f; 6Ob330/98t; 8Ob190/98v; 4Ob308/99v; 8Ob348/99f; 1Ob120/00d; 6Ob208/00g; 7Ob23/01k; 1Ob22/01v; 6Ob19/01i; 1Ob126/01p; 6Ob183/01g; 9ObA212/01v; 3Ob314/01z; 9ObA95/02i; 6Ob262/02a; 4Ob57/03s; 8ObA47/04a; 7Ob116/05t; 6Ob13/06i; 3Ob32/06m; 8ObA46/06g; 6Ob182/06t; 1Ob166/06b; 4Ob213/06m; 3Ob113/07z; 8ObA72/07g; 9Ob29/07s; 6Ob105/08x; 2Ob166/08p; 5Ob168/08d; 1Ob254/09y; 3Ob14/11x; 13Os45/12k; 6Ob246/12p; 7Ob55/14k (7Ob56/14g); 6Ob178/14s; 6Ob136/15s; 3Ob111/19y; 9ObA137/19s; 3Ob47/20p; 6Ob118/20a; 6Ob191/21p; 1Ob242/22b; 6Ob244/22h; 6Ob41/24h; 6Ob92/25k · OGH · 3. Juli 2025

Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.

Normen

ALöschG §2FBG §29 Abs2FBG §40 Abs4GmbHG §93ZPO §1 Ae6
ANWALT FINDEN