Entscheidung
OGH · 4Ob391/84; 4Ob364/85; 4Ob338/86; 4Ob339/86; 4Ob48/88; 4Ob57/89; 4Ob17/90; 4Ob28/90; 3Ob63/90; 4Ob66/92 (4Ob67/92); 4Ob133/94; 4Ob82/95; 4Ob2137/96k; 4Ob68/98y; 4Ob283/99t; 4Ob199/99i; 4Ob262/02m; 4Ob79/06f; 4Ob134/06v; 17Ob11/07b; 17Ob1/08h; 17Ob3/08b; 17Ob8/08p; 17Ob2/09g; 17Ob26/09m; 17Ob19/10h; 17Ob7/11w; 4Ob26/18d; 4Ob99/20t; 4Ob205/20f; 4Ob111/21h; 4Ob206/22f; 4Ob215/24g · 29. September 2025
4Ob391/84; 4Ob364/85; 4Ob338/86; 4Ob339/86; 4Ob48/88; 4Ob57/89; 4Ob17/90; 4Ob28/90; 3Ob63/90; 4Ob66/92 (4Ob67/92); 4Ob133/94; 4Ob82/95; 4Ob2137/96k; 4Ob68/98y; 4Ob283/99t; 4Ob199/99i; 4Ob262/02m; 4Ob79/06f; 4Ob134/06v; 17Ob11/07b; 17Ob1/08h; 17Ob3/08b; 17Ob8/08p; 17Ob2/09g; 17Ob26/09m; 17Ob19/10h; 17Ob7/11w; 4Ob26/18d; 4Ob99/20t; 4Ob205/20f; 4Ob111/21h; 4Ob206/22f; 4Ob215/24g · OGH · 29. September 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.