Entscheidung
OGH · 12Os180/83; 13Os126/86; 15Os55/88; 13Os143/88; 15Os111/89 (15Os112/89); 11Os140/89; 14Os144/93; 14Os41/06w; 15Os50/09f; 13Os65/10y; 14Os17/11y; 12Os62/11a; 13Os4/15k; 14Os56/18v; 14Os120/20h; 12Os134/20b; 13Os37/22y; 14Os66/22w (14Os87/22h); 12Os29/23s; 14Os16/23v; 13Os14/23t; 13Os56/23v; 15Os110/23z; 15Os112/23v; 13Os24/24i; 12Os22/25i; 11Os34/25x; 15Os20/25t · 4. Juni 2025
12Os180/83; 13Os126/86; 15Os55/88; 13Os143/88; 15Os111/89 (15Os112/89); 11Os140/89; 14Os144/93; 14Os41/06w; 15Os50/09f; 13Os65/10y; 14Os17/11y; 12Os62/11a; 13Os4/15k; 14Os56/18v; 14Os120/20h; 12Os134/20b; 13Os37/22y; 14Os66/22w (14Os87/22h); 12Os29/23s; 14Os16/23v; 13Os14/23t; 13Os56/23v; 15Os110/23z; 15Os112/23v; 13Os24/24i; 12Os22/25i; 11Os34/25x; 15Os20/25t · OGH · 4. Juni 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.