Entscheidung
OGH · 11Os119/80; 10Os104/82; 11Os13/83; 15Os150/87; 11Os4/88; 11Os30/89; 15Os53/89; 14Os94/90; 14Os8/92; 15Os56/92; 11Os100/92 (11Os101/92); 11Os127/92; 14Os41/93; 14Os40/93; 15Os130/93; 14Os146/93; 11Os154/94 (11Os155/94); 14Os114/95; 15Os78/95; 13Os114/96; 15Os172/96; 11Os112/98 (11Os122/98); 14Os41/02; 13Os135/05k; 13Os117/11x; 13Os25/12v; 15Os110/12h (15Os144/12h); 12Os41/21b; 12Os127/21z; 12Os62/21s; 15Os85/21w (15Os86/21t, 15Os87/21i, 15Os88/21m); 15Os50/22z · 7. Juni 2022
11Os119/80; 10Os104/82; 11Os13/83; 15Os150/87; 11Os4/88; 11Os30/89; 15Os53/89; 14Os94/90; 14Os8/92; 15Os56/92; 11Os100/92 (11Os101/92); 11Os127/92; 14Os41/93; 14Os40/93; 15Os130/93; 14Os146/93; 11Os154/94 (11Os155/94); 14Os114/95; 15Os78/95; 13Os114/96; 15Os172/96; 11Os112/98 (11Os122/98); 14Os41/02; 13Os135/05k; 13Os117/11x; 13Os25/12v; 15Os110/12h (15Os144/12h); 12Os41/21b; 12Os127/21z; 12Os62/21s; 15Os85/21w (15Os86/21t, 15Os87/21i, 15Os88/21m); 15Os50/22z · OGH · 7. Juni 2022
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.