OGH

OGH · 9Os123/78; 10Os183/79; 12Os131/79; 10Os112/80; 13Os183/80; 10Os144/80; 9Os87/82; 9Os171/82; 12Os142/82; 10Os80/83; 10Os166/83; 13Os199/84; 11Os136/85; 10Os36/85; 11Os39/86; 10Os128/86; 10Os148/86; 12Os170/86; 12Os165/89 (12Os170/89); 11Os102/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 13Os104/92; 11Os137/92; 11Os43/93 (11Os51/93); 15Os80/93 (15Os81/93); 15Os113/94; 14Os22/95; 12Os59/95; 12Os174/96; 13Os140/96 (13Os141/96); 12Os132/96; 15Os102/99 (15Os103/99); 13Os10/00; 14Os111/00; 13Os34/01; 14Os148/00; 11Os173/01; 15Os87/02; 15Os156/03; 11Os134/03; 13Os118/03; 14Os110/04; 14Os141/04; 14Os65/05y; 12Os125/06h; 13Os43/09m; 11Os59/14g; 11Os65/16t; 14Os38/22b; 15Os2/23t; 14Os72/23d; 13Os71/23z; 14Os65/24a; 12Os136/25d · 28. April 2026

Veröff: EvBl 1980/89 S 273 Beisatz: Keinen Dritten (hier Gattin). (T1) Veröff: JBl 1980,436 Vgl; Beisatz: Der Wille des Täters, von ihm selbsterlangte Beute für andere zu verwenden, schließt gewerbsmäßige Begehung nicht aus. (T2) Beis wie T1; Beisatz:...

Rechtssatz28. April 2026ECLI:AT:OGH0002:1979:RS0086962

Original im RIS öffnen · PDF

Quelle: Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS). Die lokale Darstellung, Verlinkungen und Kontextangaben dienen der Orientierung und ersetzen keine juristische Prüfung.

Details

Gericht/Organ: OGH
Anwendung: Justiz
Dokumenttyp: Rechtssatz
Geschäftszahl: 9Os123/78; 10Os183/79; 12Os131/79; 10Os112/80; 13Os183/80; 10Os144/80; 9Os87/82; 9Os171/82; 12Os142/82; 10Os80/83; 10Os166/83; 13Os199/84; 11Os136/85; 10Os36/85; 11Os39/86; 10Os128/86; 10Os148/86; 12Os170/86; 12Os165/89 (12Os170/89); 11Os102/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 13Os104/92; 11Os137/92; 11Os43/93 (11Os51/93); 15Os80/93 (15Os81/93); 15Os113/94; 14Os22/95; 12Os59/95; 12Os174/96; 13Os140/96 (13Os141/96); 12Os132/96; 15Os102/99 (15Os103/99); 13Os10/00; 14Os111/00; 13Os34/01; 14Os148/00; 11Os173/01; 15Os87/02; 15Os156/03; 11Os134/03; 13Os118/03; 14Os110/04; 14Os141/04; 14Os65/05y; 12Os125/06h; 13Os43/09m; 11Os59/14g; 11Os65/16t; 14Os38/22b; 15Os2/23t; 14Os72/23d; 13Os71/23z; 14Os65/24a; 12Os136/25d
Entscheidungsdatum: 28. April 2026
European Case Law Identifier (ECLI): ECLI:AT:OGH0002:1979:RS0086962
RIS-Dokumentnummer: JJR_19791023_OGH0002_0090OS00123_7800000_005
RIS geändert: 8. Juli 2026

Normen

FinStrG §38 Abs1 litaStGB §70

RIS HTML PDF

Entscheidung

OGH · 9Os123/78; 10Os183/79; 12Os131/79; 10Os112/80; 13Os183/80; 10Os144/80; 9Os87/82; 9Os171/82; 12Os142/82; 10Os80/83; 10Os166/83; 13Os199/84; 11Os136/85; 10Os36/85; 11Os39/86; 10Os128/86; 10Os148/86; 12Os170/86; 12Os165/89 (12Os170/89); 11Os102/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 13Os104/92; 11Os137/92; 11Os43/93 (11Os51/93); 15Os80/93 (15Os81/93); 15Os113/94; 14Os22/95; 12Os59/95; 12Os174/96; 13Os140/96 (13Os141/96); 12Os132/96; 15Os102/99 (15Os103/99); 13Os10/00; 14Os111/00; 13Os34/01; 14Os148/00; 11Os173/01; 15Os87/02; 15Os156/03; 11Os134/03; 13Os118/03; 14Os110/04; 14Os141/04; 14Os65/05y; 12Os125/06h; 13Os43/09m; 11Os59/14g; 11Os65/16t; 14Os38/22b; 15Os2/23t; 14Os72/23d; 13Os71/23z; 14Os65/24a; 12Os136/25d · 28. April 2026

9Os123/78; 10Os183/79; 12Os131/79; 10Os112/80; 13Os183/80; 10Os144/80; 9Os87/82; 9Os171/82; 12Os142/82; 10Os80/83; 10Os166/83; 13Os199/84; 11Os136/85; 10Os36/85; 11Os39/86; 10Os128/86; 10Os148/86; 12Os170/86; 12Os165/89 (12Os170/89); 11Os102/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 13Os104/92; 11Os137/92; 11Os43/93 (11Os51/93); 15Os80/93 (15Os81/93); 15Os113/94; 14Os22/95; 12Os59/95; 12Os174/96; 13Os140/96 (13Os141/96); 12Os132/96; 15Os102/99 (15Os103/99); 13Os10/00; 14Os111/00; 13Os34/01; 14Os148/00; 11Os173/01; 15Os87/02; 15Os156/03; 11Os134/03; 13Os118/03; 14Os110/04; 14Os141/04; 14Os65/05y; 12Os125/06h; 13Os43/09m; 11Os59/14g; 11Os65/16t; 14Os38/22b; 15Os2/23t; 14Os72/23d; 13Os71/23z; 14Os65/24a; 12Os136/25d · OGH · 28. April 2026

Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.

Normen

FinStrG §38 Abs1 litaStGB §70