Entscheidung
OGH · 7Ob696/78; 7Ob715/79; 4Ob566/79; 1Ob628/80; 5Ob513/80; 3Ob631/80; 3Ob591/81; 1Ob724/82; 3Ob641/82; 3Ob528/83; 1Ob562/84; 4Ob508/84; 3Ob569/84; 6Ob560/85; 6Ob583/85; 7Ob541/86; 7Ob695/86; 2Ob541/87; 4Ob527/88; 6Ob532/88; 6Ob569/88 (6Ob570/88); 1Ob635/88; 6Ob668/89 (6Ob669/89); 6Ob514/91; 2Ob554/91 (2Ob555/91, 2Ob1520/91); 1Ob608/93; 1Ob10/94; 6Ob576/95; 10Ob2433/96h; 1Ob90/98m; 9Ob361/98y; 1Ob244/01s; 3Ob170/09k; 1Ob132/14i · 24. Juli 2014
7Ob696/78; 7Ob715/79; 4Ob566/79; 1Ob628/80; 5Ob513/80; 3Ob631/80; 3Ob591/81; 1Ob724/82; 3Ob641/82; 3Ob528/83; 1Ob562/84; 4Ob508/84; 3Ob569/84; 6Ob560/85; 6Ob583/85; 7Ob541/86; 7Ob695/86; 2Ob541/87; 4Ob527/88; 6Ob532/88; 6Ob569/88 (6Ob570/88); 1Ob635/88; 6Ob668/89 (6Ob669/89); 6Ob514/91; 2Ob554/91 (2Ob555/91, 2Ob1520/91); 1Ob608/93; 1Ob10/94; 6Ob576/95; 10Ob2433/96h; 1Ob90/98m; 9Ob361/98y; 1Ob244/01s; 3Ob170/09k; 1Ob132/14i · OGH · 24. Juli 2014
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.