Entscheidung
OGH · 10Os120/74; 10Os162/74; 12Os89/75 (12Os99/75); 10Os133/76; 11Os39/77; 10Os59/79; 11Os5/81; 12Os3/82; 12Os53/82; 13Os99/82; 11Os87/83; 11Os86/85; 15Os111/87; 11Os92/87; 11Os82/92; 13Os133/93; 15Os114/97 (15Os121/97); 12Os5/02; 14Os79/02; 12Os132/09t; 15Os54/17f; 13Os103/17x; 12Os77/17s; 12Os13/18f; 15Os102/19t; 14Os57/24z; 14Os36/24m (14Os82/24a; 14Os83/24y); 13Os50/25i · 15. Oktober 2025
10Os120/74; 10Os162/74; 12Os89/75 (12Os99/75); 10Os133/76; 11Os39/77; 10Os59/79; 11Os5/81; 12Os3/82; 12Os53/82; 13Os99/82; 11Os87/83; 11Os86/85; 15Os111/87; 11Os92/87; 11Os82/92; 13Os133/93; 15Os114/97 (15Os121/97); 12Os5/02; 14Os79/02; 12Os132/09t; 15Os54/17f; 13Os103/17x; 12Os77/17s; 12Os13/18f; 15Os102/19t; 14Os57/24z; 14Os36/24m (14Os82/24a; 14Os83/24y); 13Os50/25i · OGH · 15. Oktober 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.