Entscheidung
OGH · 13Os64/72; 10Os132/75; 10Os173/76; 11Os49/77; 10Os85/77; 13Os129/77; 11Os93/77; 11Os109/80; 11Os8/78; 11Os89/78; 9Os109/78; 10Os47/80; 10Os17/80; 10Os79/81; 12Os102/81; 13Os188/81; 12Os78/83; 12Os90/83; 11Os169/84; 9Os155/85; 11Os101/86; 12Os149/86; 11Os57/87; 12Os85/89; 14Os40/90 (14Os41/90); 12Os87/90 (12Os88/90); 14Os141/93; 11Os165/93; 11Os67/94; 14Os126/95; 15Os131/96; 11Os183/98 (11Os184/98); 15Os90/06h; 14Os36/08p; 12Os84/15t; 14Os118/17k · 13. Februar 2018
13Os64/72; 10Os132/75; 10Os173/76; 11Os49/77; 10Os85/77; 13Os129/77; 11Os93/77; 11Os109/80; 11Os8/78; 11Os89/78; 9Os109/78; 10Os47/80; 10Os17/80; 10Os79/81; 12Os102/81; 13Os188/81; 12Os78/83; 12Os90/83; 11Os169/84; 9Os155/85; 11Os101/86; 12Os149/86; 11Os57/87; 12Os85/89; 14Os40/90 (14Os41/90); 12Os87/90 (12Os88/90); 14Os141/93; 11Os165/93; 11Os67/94; 14Os126/95; 15Os131/96; 11Os183/98 (11Os184/98); 15Os90/06h; 14Os36/08p; 12Os84/15t; 14Os118/17k · OGH · 13. Februar 2018
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.