Entscheidung
OGH · 6Ob204/71; 3Ob54/73 (3Ob55/73); 1Ob56/74; 1Ob689/85; 2Ob534/87; 2Ob649/87 (2Ob650/87); 1Ob601/88 (1Ob602/88; 1Ob603/88; 1Ob609/88); 3Ob505/89; 1Ob589/90; 2Ob571/90; 2Ob600/90; 7Ob670/90; 2Ob505/92 (2Ob506/92); 1Ob522/93; 1Ob501/94; 4Ob510/95; 2Ob504/95; 5Ob115/99v; 1Ob338/99h; 10Ob92/00b; 4Ob297/00f (4Ob298/00b); 1Ob8/01k; 1Ob234/01w; 5Ob157/02b; 9Ob50/04z; 6Ob157/10x; 2Ob193/13s; 3Ob185/13x; 1Ob110/19m; 6Ob73/25s · 30. April 2025
6Ob204/71; 3Ob54/73 (3Ob55/73); 1Ob56/74; 1Ob689/85; 2Ob534/87; 2Ob649/87 (2Ob650/87); 1Ob601/88 (1Ob602/88; 1Ob603/88; 1Ob609/88); 3Ob505/89; 1Ob589/90; 2Ob571/90; 2Ob600/90; 7Ob670/90; 2Ob505/92 (2Ob506/92); 1Ob522/93; 1Ob501/94; 4Ob510/95; 2Ob504/95; 5Ob115/99v; 1Ob338/99h; 10Ob92/00b; 4Ob297/00f (4Ob298/00b); 1Ob8/01k; 1Ob234/01w; 5Ob157/02b; 9Ob50/04z; 6Ob157/10x; 2Ob193/13s; 3Ob185/13x; 1Ob110/19m; 6Ob73/25s · OGH · 30. April 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.