Entscheidung
OGH · 7Ob154/70; 2Ob149/72; 1Ob247/72; 1Ob28/76 (1Ob29/76); 7Ob701/77; 3Ob634/78; 1Ob33/79; 4Ob571/79; 4Ob52/80; 1Ob750/80; 7Ob678/81; 6Ob1509/85; 1Ob558/86 (1Ob559/86); 7Ob517/87; 1Ob1537/90 (1Ob1538/90); 7Ob538/91; 1Ob669/90; 6Ob537/95; 8Ob30/97p; 1Ob391/97z; 3Ob146/99p; 3Ob283/00i; 1Ob110/02m; 8Ob63/04d; 3Ob114/09z; 7Ob130/10h; 1Ob234/11k; 10Ob77/15v · 7. Juni 2016
7Ob154/70; 2Ob149/72; 1Ob247/72; 1Ob28/76 (1Ob29/76); 7Ob701/77; 3Ob634/78; 1Ob33/79; 4Ob571/79; 4Ob52/80; 1Ob750/80; 7Ob678/81; 6Ob1509/85; 1Ob558/86 (1Ob559/86); 7Ob517/87; 1Ob1537/90 (1Ob1538/90); 7Ob538/91; 1Ob669/90; 6Ob537/95; 8Ob30/97p; 1Ob391/97z; 3Ob146/99p; 3Ob283/00i; 1Ob110/02m; 8Ob63/04d; 3Ob114/09z; 7Ob130/10h; 1Ob234/11k; 10Ob77/15v · OGH · 7. Juni 2016
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.