Entscheidung
OGH · 2Ob263/69; 2Ob290/71; 2Ob242/74; 2Ob10/75; 8Ob28/76 (8Ob31/76); 2Ob39/76; 8Ob164/76; 2Ob243/76; 2Ob48/78 (2Ob49/78); 8Ob142/78; 8Ob74/79; 8Ob122/80; 2Ob168/80; 8Ob206/80; 8Ob24/81; 8Ob103/81; 2Ob105/81; 2Ob198/82; 2Ob75/83; 8Ob138/83; 8Ob72/84; 2Ob22/85; 1Ob626/89; 2Ob6/95; 2Ob2422/96g; 2Ob48/14v; 2Ob237/14p; 1Ob160/18p; 5Ob4/22g; 2Ob4/22k · 27. Juni 2022
2Ob263/69; 2Ob290/71; 2Ob242/74; 2Ob10/75; 8Ob28/76 (8Ob31/76); 2Ob39/76; 8Ob164/76; 2Ob243/76; 2Ob48/78 (2Ob49/78); 8Ob142/78; 8Ob74/79; 8Ob122/80; 2Ob168/80; 8Ob206/80; 8Ob24/81; 8Ob103/81; 2Ob105/81; 2Ob198/82; 2Ob75/83; 8Ob138/83; 8Ob72/84; 2Ob22/85; 1Ob626/89; 2Ob6/95; 2Ob2422/96g; 2Ob48/14v; 2Ob237/14p; 1Ob160/18p; 5Ob4/22g; 2Ob4/22k · OGH · 27. Juni 2022
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.