Entscheidung
OGH · 10Os126/69; 12Os133/76; 13Os14/77; 11Os186/76; 13Os181/77; 10Os154/78; 9Os81/80; 13Os49/81; 11Os40/82; 10Os104/82; 12Os138/82; 10Os115/85; 9Os172/85; 11Os170/85; 9Os195/85; 13Os197/85; 13Os111/87; 13Os170/87; 11Os92/89; 14Os51/91; 11Os107/91 (11Os108/91); 12Os53/92 (12Os54/92); 14Os39/93; 11Os14/93; 12Os31/93; 12Os35/93 (12Os36/93); 11Os161/94; 11Os48/95; 11Os65/97 (11Os85/97); 11Os125/03; 11Os161/03; 11Os73/08g · 19. August 2008
10Os126/69; 12Os133/76; 13Os14/77; 11Os186/76; 13Os181/77; 10Os154/78; 9Os81/80; 13Os49/81; 11Os40/82; 10Os104/82; 12Os138/82; 10Os115/85; 9Os172/85; 11Os170/85; 9Os195/85; 13Os197/85; 13Os111/87; 13Os170/87; 11Os92/89; 14Os51/91; 11Os107/91 (11Os108/91); 12Os53/92 (12Os54/92); 14Os39/93; 11Os14/93; 12Os31/93; 12Os35/93 (12Os36/93); 11Os161/94; 11Os48/95; 11Os65/97 (11Os85/97); 11Os125/03; 11Os161/03; 11Os73/08g · OGH · 19. August 2008
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.