Entscheidung
OGH · 7Ob215/68; 1Ob151/72; 8Ob204/72; 4Ob548/75; 1Ob28/76 (1Ob29/76); 8Ob555/77; 2Ob135/78; 1Ob33/79; 4Ob571/79; 10Os148/79; 1Ob13/82; 3Ob49/85; 7Ob635/86; 2Ob50/89; 4Ob127/90; 15Os5/91; 7Ob551/94; 1Ob506/95; 9ObA257/98d; 4Ob13/99m; 7Ob32/99b; 5Ob151/01v; 9ObA90/01b; 3Ob62/06y; 2Ob238/07z; 7Ob130/10h; 1Ob234/11k; 10Ob77/15v; 9Ob74/21d; 10Ob41/21h · 24. Mai 2022
7Ob215/68; 1Ob151/72; 8Ob204/72; 4Ob548/75; 1Ob28/76 (1Ob29/76); 8Ob555/77; 2Ob135/78; 1Ob33/79; 4Ob571/79; 10Os148/79; 1Ob13/82; 3Ob49/85; 7Ob635/86; 2Ob50/89; 4Ob127/90; 15Os5/91; 7Ob551/94; 1Ob506/95; 9ObA257/98d; 4Ob13/99m; 7Ob32/99b; 5Ob151/01v; 9ObA90/01b; 3Ob62/06y; 2Ob238/07z; 7Ob130/10h; 1Ob234/11k; 10Ob77/15v; 9Ob74/21d; 10Ob41/21h · OGH · 24. Mai 2022
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.