Entscheidung
OGH · 8Ob182/66; 8Ob254/68; 2Ob227/69; 1Ob58/72; 4Ob540/73; 7Ob207/73; 1Ob215/73; 8Ob259/74; 7Ob826/76; 1Ob537/77; 6Ob529/78; 5Ob707/78; 1Ob566/79; 6Ob626/80; 1Ob627/82; 2Ob36/82; 8Ob103/83; 7Ob666/84; 6Ob836/83; 5Ob541/85; 7Ob685/87; 7Ob695/88; 1Ob16/90; 1Ob503/92; 1Ob503/96; 3Ob2004/96v; 1Ob2374/96s; 6Ob160/00y; 6Ob304/02b; 7Ob200/05w; 3Ob196/13i; 3Ob234/14d; 7Ob68/15y; 8Ob46/17y; 3Ob183/25w · 26. November 2025
8Ob182/66; 8Ob254/68; 2Ob227/69; 1Ob58/72; 4Ob540/73; 7Ob207/73; 1Ob215/73; 8Ob259/74; 7Ob826/76; 1Ob537/77; 6Ob529/78; 5Ob707/78; 1Ob566/79; 6Ob626/80; 1Ob627/82; 2Ob36/82; 8Ob103/83; 7Ob666/84; 6Ob836/83; 5Ob541/85; 7Ob685/87; 7Ob695/88; 1Ob16/90; 1Ob503/92; 1Ob503/96; 3Ob2004/96v; 1Ob2374/96s; 6Ob160/00y; 6Ob304/02b; 7Ob200/05w; 3Ob196/13i; 3Ob234/14d; 7Ob68/15y; 8Ob46/17y; 3Ob183/25w · OGH · 26. November 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.