Entscheidung
OGH · 6Ob178/66; 1Ob230/71; 1Ob277/71 (1Ob278/71); 6Ob99/72; 1Ob120/74; 1Ob12/75 (1Ob13/75); 8Ob558/76; 5Ob516/77; 4Ob316/77; 2Ob550/79 (2Ob551/79); 8Ob510/81; 8Ob545/82; 4Ob375/82; 1Ob51/82; 1Ob707/86; 1Ob502/88; 7Ob613/88; 4Ob58/89; 1Ob27/91; 1Ob619/93; 1Ob597/94; 7Ob644/95; 7Ob249/98p; 2Ob136/02t; 3Ob255/03a; 6Ob174/07t; 10Ob68/15w; 6Ob194/18z · 21. November 2018
6Ob178/66; 1Ob230/71; 1Ob277/71 (1Ob278/71); 6Ob99/72; 1Ob120/74; 1Ob12/75 (1Ob13/75); 8Ob558/76; 5Ob516/77; 4Ob316/77; 2Ob550/79 (2Ob551/79); 8Ob510/81; 8Ob545/82; 4Ob375/82; 1Ob51/82; 1Ob707/86; 1Ob502/88; 7Ob613/88; 4Ob58/89; 1Ob27/91; 1Ob619/93; 1Ob597/94; 7Ob644/95; 7Ob249/98p; 2Ob136/02t; 3Ob255/03a; 6Ob174/07t; 10Ob68/15w; 6Ob194/18z · OGH · 21. November 2018
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.