Entscheidung
OGH · 4Ob137/56; 7Ob289/57; 4Ob136/57; 4Ob9/59; 5Ob248/60; 4Ob104/54; 7Ob5/56; 4Ob525/64; 4Ob15/65 (4Ob16/65); 4Ob34/65; 4Ob85/70; 1Ob38/71; 2Ob217/71; 1Ob141/72 (1Ob197/72); 1Ob188/72; 8Ob112/72; 4Ob592/72; 6Ob8/75 (6Ob9/75); 1Ob23/75; 6Ob3/75; 4Ob14/75; 4Ob22/75; 4Ob22/76 (4Ob23/76; 4Ob24/76); 4Ob44/76; 4Ob558/76; 4Ob5/78; 4Ob116/78; 7Ob517/81; 7Ob692/81; 4Ob88/82; 8Ob203/83; 8ObA119/98b; 7Ob310/02t; 7Ob17/23k · 22. März 2023
4Ob137/56; 7Ob289/57; 4Ob136/57; 4Ob9/59; 5Ob248/60; 4Ob104/54; 7Ob5/56; 4Ob525/64; 4Ob15/65 (4Ob16/65); 4Ob34/65; 4Ob85/70; 1Ob38/71; 2Ob217/71; 1Ob141/72 (1Ob197/72); 1Ob188/72; 8Ob112/72; 4Ob592/72; 6Ob8/75 (6Ob9/75); 1Ob23/75; 6Ob3/75; 4Ob14/75; 4Ob22/75; 4Ob22/76 (4Ob23/76; 4Ob24/76); 4Ob44/76; 4Ob558/76; 4Ob5/78; 4Ob116/78; 7Ob517/81; 7Ob692/81; 4Ob88/82; 8Ob203/83; 8ObA119/98b; 7Ob310/02t; 7Ob17/23k · OGH · 22. März 2023
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.