Entscheidung
OGH · 5Os1082/54; 5Os1097/54; 8Os334/60; 12Os115/64; 12Os109/64; 12Os116/65; 12Os180/66; 12Os93/68; 12Os212/68; 12Os159/68; 12Os45/69; 12Os184/69; 12Os112/69; 12Os263/69; 12Os300/69; 12Os80/70; 12Os72/70; 12Os69/70; 12Os218/70; 12Os42/71; 12Os74/71; 12Os149/71; 12Os4/72; 12Os20/72; 13Os38/74; 11Os37/74; 11Os85/74; 11Os118/75; 10Os162/75; 9Os61/76; 13Os139/76; 13Os116/77 (13Os117/77); 9Os88/85; 10Os136/86; 12Os188/94; 15Os50/95; 14Os83/01; 13Os62/09f; 12Os35/20v · 10. September 2020
5Os1082/54; 5Os1097/54; 8Os334/60; 12Os115/64; 12Os109/64; 12Os116/65; 12Os180/66; 12Os93/68; 12Os212/68; 12Os159/68; 12Os45/69; 12Os184/69; 12Os112/69; 12Os263/69; 12Os300/69; 12Os80/70; 12Os72/70; 12Os69/70; 12Os218/70; 12Os42/71; 12Os74/71; 12Os149/71; 12Os4/72; 12Os20/72; 13Os38/74; 11Os37/74; 11Os85/74; 11Os118/75; 10Os162/75; 9Os61/76; 13Os139/76; 13Os116/77 (13Os117/77); 9Os88/85; 10Os136/86; 12Os188/94; 15Os50/95; 14Os83/01; 13Os62/09f; 12Os35/20v · OGH · 10. September 2020
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.