Entscheidung
OGH · 14Os62/04; 14Os101/05t; 11Os124/05b; 11Os139/05h; 13Os29/06y; 15Os36/06t; 12Os43/06z; 13Os116/06t; 15Os143/06b; 15Os140/06m; 11Os118/07y; 14Os134/07y; 14Os127/07v; 12Os137/07z; 14Os174/07f; 13Os101/08i; 11Os116/08f; 11Os62/08i; 14Os140/08g; 15Os54/09v; 12Os8/09g (12Os9/09d); 13Os99/09x; 14Os6/10d; 11Os43/10y; 12Os153/09f; 13Os43/10p; 13Os47/10a; 11Os62/10t; 14Os144/10y; 12Os200/10v; 12Os147/10z; 14Os68/11y; 15Os94/11d; 11Os99/11k; 14Os116/11g (14Os1127/11z); 11Os5/12p; 15Os53/12a; 13Os163/11m; 15Os70/12a; 12Os95/12f; 13Os102/12t; 17Os20/12p; 17Os22/12g; 14Os9/13z; 12Os11/13d; 15Os51/13h; 11Os65/13p; 11Os67/13g; 13Os57/13a; 14Os120/13y; 17Os12/13p; 15Os118/13m; 13Os68/13v; 14Os175/13m; 14Os171/13y; 11Os23/14p; 12Os41/14t; 17Os27/14w; 15Os105/14a; 14Os140/14s; 12Os151/14v; 13Os121/14i; 13Os128/14v; 13Os126/14z; 15Os26/15k; 12Os23/15x; 13Os2/14i; 12Os38/15b; 12Os121/14g; 13Os47/15h; 14Os73/16s; 17Os36/15w; 14Os85/17g; 13Os88/17s (13Os89/17p; 13Os90; 17k; 13Os91/17g; 13Os92/17d; 13Os93/17a); 14Os78/18d; 14Os76/18k; 12Os88/19m; 13Os89/19s; 14Os34/20m; 13Os87/19x; 14Os37/20b; 14Os55/20z; 14Os135/20i; 13Os78/21a; 14Os113/21f; 11Os99/22a; 15Os2/23t; 13Os71/23z; 12Os133/23k; 15Os14/24h; 14Os21/24f; 13Os106/23x (13Os107/23v); 12Os29/25v (12Os30/25s); 15Os4/26s; 13Os9/26m · 22. Juli 2026
14Os62/04; 14Os101/05t; 11Os124/05b; 11Os139/05h; 13Os29/06y; 15Os36/06t; 12Os43/06z; 13Os116/06t; 15Os143/06b; 15Os140/06m; 11Os118/07y; 14Os134/07y; 14Os127/07v; 12Os137/07z; 14Os174/07f; 13Os101/08i; 11Os116/08f; 11Os62/08i; 14Os140/08g; 15Os54/09v; 12Os8/09g (12Os9/09d); 13Os99/09x; 14Os6/10d; 11Os43/10y; 12Os153/09f; 13Os43/10p; 13Os47/10a; 11Os62/10t; 14Os144/10y; 12Os200/10v; 12Os147/10z; 14Os68/11y; 15Os94/11d; 11Os99/11k; 14Os116/11g (14Os1127/11z); 11Os5/12p; 15Os53/12a; 13Os163/11m; 15Os70/12a; 12Os95/12f; 13Os102/12t; 17Os20/12p; 17Os22/12g; 14Os9/13z; 12Os11/13d; 15Os51/13h; 11Os65/13p; 11Os67/13g; 13Os57/13a; 14Os120/13y; 17Os12/13p; 15Os118/13m; 13Os68/13v; 14Os175/13m; 14Os171/13y; 11Os23/14p; 12Os41/14t; 17Os27/14w; 15Os105/14a; 14Os140/14s; 12Os151/14v; 13Os121/14i; 13Os128/14v; 13Os126/14z; 15Os26/15k; 12Os23/15x; 13Os2/14i; 12Os38/15b; 12Os121/14g; 13Os47/15h; 14Os73/16s; 17Os36/15w; 14Os85/17g; 13Os88/17s (13Os89/17p; 13Os90; 17k; 13Os91/17g; 13Os92/17d; 13Os93/17a); 14Os78/18d; 14Os76/18k; 12Os88/19m; 13Os89/19s; 14Os34/20m; 13Os87/19x; 14Os37/20b; 14Os55/20z; 14Os135/20i; 13Os78/21a; 14Os113/21f; 11Os99/22a; 15Os2/23t; 13Os71/23z; 12Os133/23k; 15Os14/24h; 14Os21/24f; 13Os106/23x (13Os107/23v); 12Os29/25v (12Os30/25s); 15Os4/26s; 13Os9/26m · OGH · 22. Juli 2026
Der Entscheidungstext ist noch nicht lokal gespeichert. Die Aktualisierung wurde im Hintergrund vorgemerkt; die Originalquelle im RIS ist verknüpft.
Normen
Kontext
Weitere Entscheidungen zu diesen Normen
Veröff: SSt 54/10 = EvBl 1984/7 S 20 Vgl auch Vgl auch; Beisatz: Ausnützung der Stellung gegenüber dem Opfer bedeutet, daß der Täter seine Autorität zur Erreichung der Unzuchtshandlung einsetzt. (T1) Auch; Beisatz: Das zur Tatbestandsverwirklichung essentielle Ausnützen...
StGB §202 · StGB §212 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 litaOGH · RechtssatzOGH · 14Os55/05b; 13Os93/05h; 11Os117/06z; 15Os56/06h; 13Os122/06z; 12Os154/07z; 14Os30/08f; 14Os54/09m; 13Os75/09t; 15Os51/10d; 15Os79/11y; 14Os14/13k; 12Os168/11i; 14Os43/14a; 11Os59/14g; 14Os108/14k; 20Os26/15x; 11Os99/16t; 15Os124/16y; 22Os2/16h; 13Os127/16z (13Os52/17x); 14Os121/17a; 11Os8/19i; 14Os86/19g; 15Os26/20t; 13Os55/20t; 14Os59/20p; 15Os112/22t (15Os113/22i); 15Os98/22h; 12Os126/23f; 15Os40/26k; 22Ds10/25b; 12Os44/26a · 5. August 202614Os55/05b; 13Os93/05h; 11Os117/06z; 15Os56/06h; 13Os122/06z; 12Os154/07z; 14Os30/08f; 14Os54/09m; 13Os75/09t; 15Os51/10d; 15Os79/11y; 14Os14/13k; 12Os168/11i; 14Os43/14a; 11Os59/14g; 14Os108/14k; 20Os26/15x; 11Os99/16t; 15Os124/16y; 22Os2/16h; 13Os127/16z (13Os52/17x); 14Os121/17a; 11Os8/19i; 14Os86/19g; 15Os26/20t; 13Os55/20t; 14Os59/20p; 15Os112/22t (15Os113/22i); 15Os98/22h; 12Os126/23f; 15Os40/26k; 22Ds10/25b; 12Os44/26a · 5. August 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2005:RS0120128Vgl; Beisatz: Betrifft die unrichtige rechtliche Beurteilung bloß einen Strafzumessungsaspekt, so bietet sie keinen Anlass zu amtswegigem Einschreiten nach § 290 Abs 1 zweiter Satz StPO. (T1) Auch; nur: Schuld- und Freispruch beziehen sich nicht auf die rechtliche...
StGB §28 Abs1 G · StPO §34 Abs2 A · StPO §259 Z3 · StPO §260 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z7 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z8 D · StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 · StPO §268 Abs2 Z3OGH · RechtssatzOGH · 11Os41/19t; 11Os45/20g; 11Os49/20w; 11Os111/21i; 15Os147/21p; 12Os82/23k; 15Os96/24t (15Os97/24i); 13Os82/25w; 11Os24/26b; 13Os14/26x; 14Os48/26d; 14Os55/26h; 12Os18/26b · 5. August 202611Os41/19t; 11Os45/20g; 11Os49/20w; 11Os111/21i; 15Os147/21p; 12Os82/23k; 15Os96/24t (15Os97/24i); 13Os82/25w; 11Os24/26b; 13Os14/26x; 14Os48/26d; 14Os55/26h; 12Os18/26b · 5. August 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2019:RS0132763Vgl; Beisatz: Das Fehlen der inländischen Gerichtsbarkeit wird als Ausnahme begriffen. (T1)Beisatz: Hier: Rechtsfehler mangels (die rechtliche Annahme der Beseitigung des in tatsächlicher Hinsicht konstatierten Ausnahmesatzes tragender) Feststellungen (hier Z 9 lit a). (T2) Vgl Vgl; Beis wie...
StGB §62 · StGB §64 · StGB §65 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 lita, StPO §311 · StPO §313 · StPO §345 Abs1 Z6 · StPO §345 Abs1 Z11 lita · StPO §345 Abs1 Z11 litbOGH · RechtssatzOGH · 13Os151/03; 14Os10/05k; 14Os15/05w; 11Os96/05k; 11Os143/05x; 12Os33/06d; 11Os10/06i; 11Os61/06i; 11Os95/06i; 13Os121/06b; 12Os96/07w; 13Os16/08i; 14Os101/08x; 13Os105/08b; 13Os86/09k; 15Os90/10i; 14Os175/10g; 13Os104/10h; 15Os46/11w; 13Os55/11d; 15Os94/12f; 11Os2/13y; 11Os11/13x; 12Os137/12g; 12Os139/12a; 13Os97/13h; 11Os44/14a; 11Os99/14i; 11Os98/15v; 20Os2/16v; 11Os46/16y; 14Os49/16m; 17Os15/16h; 11Os68/17k; 12Os14/18b; 11Os75/17i; 15Os58/18w; 14Os41/18p; 15Os114/19g; 15Os151/19y; 12Os112/20t; 14Os29/21b; 13Os47/21t; 14Os22/22z (14Os23/22x); 14Os128/21m; 15Os114/22m; 13Os56/23v; 13Os74/23s; 11Os75/23y; 14Os15/24y; 12Os16/24f; 12Os67/24f; 13Os78/25g; 14Os71/25k; 15Os155/25w; 14Os21/26h · 28. Juli 202613Os151/03; 14Os10/05k; 14Os15/05w; 11Os96/05k; 11Os143/05x; 12Os33/06d; 11Os10/06i; 11Os61/06i; 11Os95/06i; 13Os121/06b; 12Os96/07w; 13Os16/08i; 14Os101/08x; 13Os105/08b; 13Os86/09k; 15Os90/10i; 14Os175/10g; 13Os104/10h; 15Os46/11w; 13Os55/11d; 15Os94/12f; 11Os2/13y; 11Os11/13x; 12Os137/12g; 12Os139/12a; 13Os97/13h; 11Os44/14a; 11Os99/14i; 11Os98/15v; 20Os2/16v; 11Os46/16y; 14Os49/16m; 17Os15/16h; 11Os68/17k; 12Os14/18b; 11Os75/17i; 15Os58/18w; 14Os41/18p; 15Os114/19g; 15Os151/19y; 12Os112/20t; 14Os29/21b; 13Os47/21t; 14Os22/22z (14Os23/22x); 14Os128/21m; 15Os114/22m; 13Os56/23v; 13Os74/23s; 11Os75/23y; 14Os15/24y; 12Os16/24f; 12Os67/24f; 13Os78/25g; 14Os71/25k; 15Os155/25w; 14Os21/26h · 28. Juli 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2003:RS0118429Auch; Beisatz: Hier: Erlass des BMfJ vom 4. Jänner 1996, Z 703.012/25-II.2/90, betreffend die strafrechtliche Beurteilung des Anbaus von Pflanzen, aus denen Suchtgift gewonnen werden kann, JABl Nr. 15/1996. (T1) Auch; nur: Begnügt sich der Beschwerdeführer zur Begründung...
StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z10 A · StPO §285 Abs1 · StPO §285a Z2 · StPO §285dOGH · RechtssatzOGH · 11Os162/95; 15Os95/02; 12Os106/13z; 15Os167/13t; 13Os1/14t; 14Os64/14i; 12Os120/14k; 13Os121/14i; 13Os140/14h; 13Os64/14g; 14Os7/15h; 15Os160/14i; 14Os20/15w; 13Os115/14g; 13Os2/14i; 11Os39/15t; 12Os49/15w; 13Os96/15i; 13Os124/15g; 12Os77/15p; 14Os1/16b; 13Os114/15m; 12Os38/16d; 15Os26/16m; 13Os53/16t; 12Os46/16f; 13Os61/16v; 13Os82/16g; 12Os116/16z; 13Os60/17y; 14Os128/16d (14Os129/16a); 13Os55/17p; 13Os118/17b; 13Os138/17v; 15Os32/18x; 15Os121/18k; 12Os26/19v; 13Os107/20i; 13Os36/22a; 26Ds5/20i; 13Os26/22f; 14Os95/22k; 23Ds3/22a; 13Os127/22h; 15Os12/23p; 14Os35/23p; 12Os27/23x; 13Os25/23k; 11Os21/23g; 14Os23/23y; 12Os67/23d; 13Os63/23y; 14Os100/23x; 12Os21/24s; 15Os30/24m; 15Os84/24b; 15Os58/25f; 15Os122/25t; 11Os11/26s; 14Os70/26i · 28. Juli 202611Os162/95; 15Os95/02; 12Os106/13z; 15Os167/13t; 13Os1/14t; 14Os64/14i; 12Os120/14k; 13Os121/14i; 13Os140/14h; 13Os64/14g; 14Os7/15h; 15Os160/14i; 14Os20/15w; 13Os115/14g; 13Os2/14i; 11Os39/15t; 12Os49/15w; 13Os96/15i; 13Os124/15g; 12Os77/15p; 14Os1/16b; 13Os114/15m; 12Os38/16d; 15Os26/16m; 13Os53/16t; 12Os46/16f; 13Os61/16v; 13Os82/16g; 12Os116/16z; 13Os60/17y; 14Os128/16d (14Os129/16a); 13Os55/17p; 13Os118/17b; 13Os138/17v; 15Os32/18x; 15Os121/18k; 12Os26/19v; 13Os107/20i; 13Os36/22a; 26Ds5/20i; 13Os26/22f; 14Os95/22k; 23Ds3/22a; 13Os127/22h; 15Os12/23p; 14Os35/23p; 12Os27/23x; 13Os25/23k; 11Os21/23g; 14Os23/23y; 12Os67/23d; 13Os63/23y; 14Os100/23x; 12Os21/24s; 15Os30/24m; 15Os84/24b; 15Os58/25f; 15Os122/25t; 11Os11/26s; 14Os70/26i · 28. Juli 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:1996:RS0095939Auch Vgl auch Auch Auch Auch; Beisatz: Die Rechtsrüge kritisierte die Verwendung der verba legalia für die Konstatierungen zur subjektiven Tatseite der Angeklagten, ohne jedoch darzulegen, welcher weiteren Feststellungen es bedurft hätte. (T1) Auch Beis wie T1 Auch...
StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 litaOGH · RechtssatzOGH · 17Os56/14k; 13Os128/18z; 14Os40/19t; 28Ds9/18i; 15Os16/20x; 27Ds2/19d; 14Os47/20y; 15Os73/20d; 14Os19/21g; 14Os60/21m; 14Os105/21d; 14Os8/22s; 14Os143/21t (14Os144/21t); 13Os73/22t; 12Os10/23x; 13Os88/23z; 20Ds10/23k; 11Os88/24m; 15Os147/24t (15Os148/24i); 23Ds2/24g; 13Os72/25z; 13Os124/25x; 14Os98/25f; 13Os9/26m; 14Os21/26h · 28. Juli 202617Os56/14k; 13Os128/18z; 14Os40/19t; 28Ds9/18i; 15Os16/20x; 27Ds2/19d; 14Os47/20y; 15Os73/20d; 14Os19/21g; 14Os60/21m; 14Os105/21d; 14Os8/22s; 14Os143/21t (14Os144/21t); 13Os73/22t; 12Os10/23x; 13Os88/23z; 20Ds10/23k; 11Os88/24m; 15Os147/24t (15Os148/24i); 23Ds2/24g; 13Os72/25z; 13Os124/25x; 14Os98/25f; 13Os9/26m; 14Os21/26h · 28. Juli 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2015:RS0130194Beisatz: Hier: Zur (abstrakten) Befugnis eines Beamten der Kriminalpolizei, die sich unmittelbar aus dem Gesetz ergibt. (T1) Auch; Beisatz: Äußerungen eines Sachverständigen zu Rechtsfragen (hier: zu § 22 BAO) sind unter dem Aspekt des § 281 Abs 1...
StPO §281 Abs1 Z4 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z5 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 · StPO §281 Abs1 Z10OGH · RechtssatzOGH · 13Os28/04; 14Os81/08f; 14Os81/09g; 13Os135/09s; 14Os105/09m; 14Os31/10f; 12Os14/11t; 12Os30/11w; 11Os22/12p; 13Os12/12g; 15Os55/12w; 17Os15/12b; 12Os92/12i; 13Os64/12d; 14Os117/12f; 15Os106/13x; 14Os2/15y; 13Os34/16y (13Os35/16w); 11Os140/16x; 13Os132/17m; 13Os24/18f; 14Os45/18a; 13Os63/18s; 11Os101/18i; 14Os126/18p; 12Os12/19k; 13Os93/19d; 11Os128/20p; 13Os95/21a; 11Os111/21i; 13Os134/21m; 14Os11/22g; 13Os23/22i; 12Os119/22z; 11Os38/23g; 12Os140/23i; 15Os49/24f; 15Os36/24v; 11Os151/24a; 13Os26/25k; 15Os72/25i; 12Os109/25h; 14Os50/26y · 28. Juli 202613Os28/04; 14Os81/08f; 14Os81/09g; 13Os135/09s; 14Os105/09m; 14Os31/10f; 12Os14/11t; 12Os30/11w; 11Os22/12p; 13Os12/12g; 15Os55/12w; 17Os15/12b; 12Os92/12i; 13Os64/12d; 14Os117/12f; 15Os106/13x; 14Os2/15y; 13Os34/16y (13Os35/16w); 11Os140/16x; 13Os132/17m; 13Os24/18f; 14Os45/18a; 13Os63/18s; 11Os101/18i; 14Os126/18p; 12Os12/19k; 13Os93/19d; 11Os128/20p; 13Os95/21a; 11Os111/21i; 13Os134/21m; 14Os11/22g; 13Os23/22i; 12Os119/22z; 11Os38/23g; 12Os140/23i; 15Os49/24f; 15Os36/24v; 11Os151/24a; 13Os26/25k; 15Os72/25i; 12Os109/25h; 14Os50/26y · 28. Juli 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2004:RS0119234nur: Die Bejahung oder Verneinung der Sachverhaltsgrundlagen des normativen Tatbestandsmerkmals "nationalsozialistisch" im Sinne des § 3g VerbotsG ist auf der Feststellungsebene angesiedelt und somit allein den Geschworenen zur Beantwortung vorbehalten. (T1) Beisatz: Bejahen die Geschworenen die Schuldfrage, ist...
StPO §345 Abs1 Z6 · StPO §345 Abs1 Z8 · StPO §345 Abs1 Z10a · StPO §345 Abs1 Z11 lita · StPO §345 Abs1 Z12 · VerbotsG §3g · StGB §256OGH · RechtssatzOGH · 13Os147/11h; 17Os19/12s; 11Os75/13h; 14Os90/13m; 17Os11/13s; 14Os15/14h; 15Os179/13g; 15Os12/14z; 13Os72/13g; 13Os92/13y; 14Os126/14g; 13Os74/14b; 11Os7/15m; 12Os3/15f; 12Os157/14a; 14Os144/14d; 15Os70/15f; 11Os86/15d; 15Os125/15v; 13Os67/15z; 12Os125/15x; 13Os48/15f; 12Os88/15f; 15Os97/15a; 12Os29/16f; 15Os175/15x; 12Os40/16y; 12Os1/16p; 12Os47/16b; 13Os62/16s; 12Os21/16d; 14Os82/16i; 14Os79/16y; 14Os61/16a; 14Os7/17m; 12Os4/17f; 11Os25/17m (11Os26/17h); 15Os137/16k; 13Os117/16d; 14Os31/17s; 22Ds3/17m; 25Ds2/17m; 14Os36/17a; 11Os76/17m; 14Os78/17b; 26Ds2/17v; 15Os156/17f; 12Os6/18a; 15Os18/18p; 13Os11/18v; 11Os1/18h; 14Os42/18k; 12Os67/18x; 11Os63/18a; 14Os64/18w; 12Os148/17g; 14Os121/18b; 12Os49/19a (12Os50/19y); 14Os54/19a; 13Os97/19t; 14Os19/20f; 14Os141/19w; 30Ds5/19t; 15Os30/20f; 15Os118/20x; 28Ds10/19p; 28Ds6/20a; 13Os9/21d; 13Os10/21a; 14Os90/21y; 12Os111/21x; 11Os32/22y; 14Os59/22s; 11Os82/22a; 11Os131/22g; 12Os17/23a; 13Os122/22y (13Os123/22w); 15Os67/22z (15Os68/22x); 14Os70/23k; 14Os78/23m; 15Os139/23i; 15Os145/23x; 14Os20/24h; 13Os18/24g; 14Os40/24z; 13Os76/24m; 22Ds7/24k; 13Os38/25z; 22Ds1/25d; 12Os106/25t; 14Os84/25x; 14Os121/25p; 13Os21/26a; 13Os55/26a; 15Os74/26k · 22. Juli 202613Os147/11h; 17Os19/12s; 11Os75/13h; 14Os90/13m; 17Os11/13s; 14Os15/14h; 15Os179/13g; 15Os12/14z; 13Os72/13g; 13Os92/13y; 14Os126/14g; 13Os74/14b; 11Os7/15m; 12Os3/15f; 12Os157/14a; 14Os144/14d; 15Os70/15f; 11Os86/15d; 15Os125/15v; 13Os67/15z; 12Os125/15x; 13Os48/15f; 12Os88/15f; 15Os97/15a; 12Os29/16f; 15Os175/15x; 12Os40/16y; 12Os1/16p; 12Os47/16b; 13Os62/16s; 12Os21/16d; 14Os82/16i; 14Os79/16y; 14Os61/16a; 14Os7/17m; 12Os4/17f; 11Os25/17m (11Os26/17h); 15Os137/16k; 13Os117/16d; 14Os31/17s; 22Ds3/17m; 25Ds2/17m; 14Os36/17a; 11Os76/17m; 14Os78/17b; 26Ds2/17v; 15Os156/17f; 12Os6/18a; 15Os18/18p; 13Os11/18v; 11Os1/18h; 14Os42/18k; 12Os67/18x; 11Os63/18a; 14Os64/18w; 12Os148/17g; 14Os121/18b; 12Os49/19a (12Os50/19y); 14Os54/19a; 13Os97/19t; 14Os19/20f; 14Os141/19w; 30Ds5/19t; 15Os30/20f; 15Os118/20x; 28Ds10/19p; 28Ds6/20a; 13Os9/21d; 13Os10/21a; 14Os90/21y; 12Os111/21x; 11Os32/22y; 14Os59/22s; 11Os82/22a; 11Os131/22g; 12Os17/23a; 13Os122/22y (13Os123/22w); 15Os67/22z (15Os68/22x); 14Os70/23k; 14Os78/23m; 15Os139/23i; 15Os145/23x; 14Os20/24h; 13Os18/24g; 14Os40/24z; 13Os76/24m; 22Ds7/24k; 13Os38/25z; 22Ds1/25d; 12Os106/25t; 14Os84/25x; 14Os121/25p; 13Os21/26a; 13Os55/26a; 15Os74/26k · 22. Juli 2026 · ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2011:RS0127315Vgl Vgl Vgl Vgl Auch; Beisatz: Hier: Der Angeklagte, Geschäftsführer einer GmbH, übertrug die Aufgabe des Abführens der Sozialversicherungsbeiträge an einen Rechtsanwalt. Das Ersturteil enthielt keine Feststellung, dass der Rechtsanwalt organschaftlicher Vertreter der GmbH gewesen sei (§ 153c...
StPO §281 Abs1 Z9 lita · StPO §281 Abs1 Z4 B · StPO §281 Abs1 Z5 B · StPO §282 Abs2 · StPO §259 · StPO §468 · DSt §49