Entscheidung
OGH · 1Ob550/91; 1Ob602/91; 4Ob1605/91; 1Ob579/92; 8Ob566/92 (8Ob567/92); 2Ob505/94; 1Ob623/95; 1Ob2155/96k; 3Ob2368/96y; 5Ob229/98g; 9Ob115/99y; 1Ob265/00b; 9Ob268/01d; 7Ob253/01h; 7Ob43/03d; 6Ob160/06g; 5Ob171/06t; 3Ob111/06d; 2Ob195/07a; 3Ob70/08b; 1Ob93/08w; 5Ob207/08i; 3Ob74/09t; 1Ob63/10m (1Ob78/10t); 8Ob1/11x; 3Ob240/12h; 1Ob226/12k · 20. Februar 2013
1Ob550/91; 1Ob602/91; 4Ob1605/91; 1Ob579/92; 8Ob566/92 (8Ob567/92); 2Ob505/94; 1Ob623/95; 1Ob2155/96k; 3Ob2368/96y; 5Ob229/98g; 9Ob115/99y; 1Ob265/00b; 9Ob268/01d; 7Ob253/01h; 7Ob43/03d; 6Ob160/06g; 5Ob171/06t; 3Ob111/06d; 2Ob195/07a; 3Ob70/08b; 1Ob93/08w; 5Ob207/08i; 3Ob74/09t; 1Ob63/10m (1Ob78/10t); 8Ob1/11x; 3Ob240/12h; 1Ob226/12k · OGH · 20. Februar 2013
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.