Entscheidung
OGH · 10ObS47/87; 10ObS133/88; 10ObS326/88; 10ObS327/89; 10ObS397/89; 10ObS299/90; 10ObS32/91; 10ObS46/92; 10ObS148/92; 10ObS50/93; 10ObS218/94; 10ObS68/95; 10ObS201/95; 10ObS2144/96h; 10ObS2079/96z; 10ObS20/98h; 10ObS25/99w; 10ObS48/99b; 10ObS65/99b; 10ObS216/99h; 10ObS157/99g; 10ObS3/00i; 10ObS120/00w; 10ObS332/99t; 10ObS320/00g; 10ObS12/01i; 10ObS390/01b; 10ObS34/06g; 10ObS25/15x; 10ObS29/17p; 10ObS19/22z · 24. Mai 2022
10ObS47/87; 10ObS133/88; 10ObS326/88; 10ObS327/89; 10ObS397/89; 10ObS299/90; 10ObS32/91; 10ObS46/92; 10ObS148/92; 10ObS50/93; 10ObS218/94; 10ObS68/95; 10ObS201/95; 10ObS2144/96h; 10ObS2079/96z; 10ObS20/98h; 10ObS25/99w; 10ObS48/99b; 10ObS65/99b; 10ObS216/99h; 10ObS157/99g; 10ObS3/00i; 10ObS120/00w; 10ObS332/99t; 10ObS320/00g; 10ObS12/01i; 10ObS390/01b; 10ObS34/06g; 10ObS25/15x; 10ObS29/17p; 10ObS19/22z · OGH · 24. Mai 2022
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.