Entscheidung
OGH · 11Os98/80; 12Os10/81; 13Os99/81; 12Os174/83; 11Os183/84; 13Os106/88; 11Os60/88; 14Os174/89 (14Os175/89); 13Os147/90; 12Os15/91; 12Os113/91; 12Os136/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 14Os14/93 (14Os15/93); 11Os137/93 (11Os151/93); 13Os181/94; 11Os179/94; 13Os36/95; 14Os85/95; 11Os102/05t (11Os103/05i); 11Os110/05v; 13Os131/08a; 14Os127/10y; 15Os185/10k; 15Os96/25v · 15. Oktober 2025
11Os98/80; 12Os10/81; 13Os99/81; 12Os174/83; 11Os183/84; 13Os106/88; 11Os60/88; 14Os174/89 (14Os175/89); 13Os147/90; 12Os15/91; 12Os113/91; 12Os136/91; 14Os128/91 (14Os129/91; 14Os130/91); 14Os14/93 (14Os15/93); 11Os137/93 (11Os151/93); 13Os181/94; 11Os179/94; 13Os36/95; 14Os85/95; 11Os102/05t (11Os103/05i); 11Os110/05v; 13Os131/08a; 14Os127/10y; 15Os185/10k; 15Os96/25v · OGH · 15. Oktober 2025
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.