Entscheidung
OGH · 11Os135/76; 10Os94/76; 9Os82/77; 10Os64/77; 10Os155/77; 12Os63/78; 12Os150/78; 9Os142/79; 13Os129/80; 10Os38/80; 9Os81/81; 13Os80/82 (13Os157/82); 9Os74/83; 10Os132/85; 9Os196/85; 12Os3/87; 16Os53/89 (16Os54/89); 14Os23/91; 14Os23/92 (14Os24/92); 15Os140/93-12; 14Os138/95; 14Os103/96; 13Os10/97 (13Os11/97); 15Os68/98 (15Os69/98, 15Os72/98) · 2. Juli 1998
11Os135/76; 10Os94/76; 9Os82/77; 10Os64/77; 10Os155/77; 12Os63/78; 12Os150/78; 9Os142/79; 13Os129/80; 10Os38/80; 9Os81/81; 13Os80/82 (13Os157/82); 9Os74/83; 10Os132/85; 9Os196/85; 12Os3/87; 16Os53/89 (16Os54/89); 14Os23/91; 14Os23/92 (14Os24/92); 15Os140/93-12; 14Os138/95; 14Os103/96; 13Os10/97 (13Os11/97); 15Os68/98 (15Os69/98, 15Os72/98) · OGH · 2. Juli 1998
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.