Entscheidung
OGH · 9Os37/74; 9Os153/75; 10Os4/80; 12Os149/80; 12Os109/81; 11Os174/81; 13Os163/81; 12Os176/81; 11Os197/81; 10Os2/82; 10Os123/82; 9Os173/82; 9Os171/82; 9Os191/82; 9Os53/83; 11Os111/83; 9Os178/83; 10Os15/84; 12Os32/84; 10Os85/84; 12Os167/85; 13Os170/85; 9Os116/85; 10Os25/86; 11Os21/86; 10Os105/86; 13Os178/85; 10Os127/86; 9Os174/86; 15Os100/87; 12Os107/87 · 24. September 1987
9Os37/74; 9Os153/75; 10Os4/80; 12Os149/80; 12Os109/81; 11Os174/81; 13Os163/81; 12Os176/81; 11Os197/81; 10Os2/82; 10Os123/82; 9Os173/82; 9Os171/82; 9Os191/82; 9Os53/83; 11Os111/83; 9Os178/83; 10Os15/84; 12Os32/84; 10Os85/84; 12Os167/85; 13Os170/85; 9Os116/85; 10Os25/86; 11Os21/86; 10Os105/86; 13Os178/85; 10Os127/86; 9Os174/86; 15Os100/87; 12Os107/87 · OGH · 24. September 1987
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.