Entscheidung
OGH · 5Ob3/68; 5Ob205/68; 5Ob338/68; 1Ob258/70 (1Ob259/70); 1Ob96/72; 4Ob651/75; 2Ob514/78; 5Ob687/77; 8Ob520/78; 3Ob563/80; 3Ob656/82; 1Ob555/86; 4Ob548/88; 1Ob567/89; 1Ob604/91; 8Ob17/94; 8Ob27/94; 7Ob2087/96d; 5Ob2403/96k; 1Ob2297/96t; 7Ob225/98h; 6Ob167/99y; 7Ob261/00h; 1Ob10/01d; 3Ob182/17m; 17Ob6/19k; 17Ob6/21p; 17Ob2/22a; 17Ob17/23h · 25. September 2023
5Ob3/68; 5Ob205/68; 5Ob338/68; 1Ob258/70 (1Ob259/70); 1Ob96/72; 4Ob651/75; 2Ob514/78; 5Ob687/77; 8Ob520/78; 3Ob563/80; 3Ob656/82; 1Ob555/86; 4Ob548/88; 1Ob567/89; 1Ob604/91; 8Ob17/94; 8Ob27/94; 7Ob2087/96d; 5Ob2403/96k; 1Ob2297/96t; 7Ob225/98h; 6Ob167/99y; 7Ob261/00h; 1Ob10/01d; 3Ob182/17m; 17Ob6/19k; 17Ob6/21p; 17Ob2/22a; 17Ob17/23h · OGH · 25. September 2023
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.