Entscheidung
OGH · 1Ob477/61 (1Ob478/61); 2Ob180/64; 2Ob336/66; 2Ob243/67; 2Ob254/67; 2Ob376/67; 2Ob71/69; 6Ob82/67; 2Ob367/69; 6Ob33/70; 2Ob104/70; 5Ob131/70; 4Ob544/70; 8Ob244/70 (8Ob245/70); 8Ob269/71; 2Ob146/71; 2Ob126/71; 7Ob261/72; 8Ob213/73; 4Ob520/74; 2Ob239/75; 2Ob15/78; 2Ob99/78; 2Ob7/79; 8Ob96/81; 8Ob35/84; 8Ob75/85; 4Ob515/93; 9ObA2153/96z; 4Ob2107/96y; 9Ob78/99g; 9Ob148/00f; 1Ob214/18d · 21. November 2018
1Ob477/61 (1Ob478/61); 2Ob180/64; 2Ob336/66; 2Ob243/67; 2Ob254/67; 2Ob376/67; 2Ob71/69; 6Ob82/67; 2Ob367/69; 6Ob33/70; 2Ob104/70; 5Ob131/70; 4Ob544/70; 8Ob244/70 (8Ob245/70); 8Ob269/71; 2Ob146/71; 2Ob126/71; 7Ob261/72; 8Ob213/73; 4Ob520/74; 2Ob239/75; 2Ob15/78; 2Ob99/78; 2Ob7/79; 8Ob96/81; 8Ob35/84; 8Ob75/85; 4Ob515/93; 9ObA2153/96z; 4Ob2107/96y; 9Ob78/99g; 9Ob148/00f; 1Ob214/18d · OGH · 21. November 2018
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.