Entscheidung
OGH · 2Ob375/60; 3Ob588/81; 6Ob876/82 (6Ob877/82); 6Ob666/83; 10ObS104/87; 10ObS99/88; 10ObS255/88; 1Ob31/94; 8ObS2/97w; 8ObA2303/96a; 10ObS165/97f; 10ObS215/97h; 10ObS356/97v; 10ObS279/97w; 10ObS401/97m; 10ObS446/97d; 10ObS304/97x; 10ObS224/98h; 10ObS68/00y; 7Ob80/07a; 7Ob22/09z; 3Ob51/10m; 3Ob71/14h; 7Ob146/15v; 9ObA72/17d; 8ObA47/17w; 6Ob120/18t; 5Ob81/19a; 9Ob23/21d; 8Ob96/21g; 6Ob231/22x; 7Ob103/25k; 7Ob156/25d · 15. April 2026
2Ob375/60; 3Ob588/81; 6Ob876/82 (6Ob877/82); 6Ob666/83; 10ObS104/87; 10ObS99/88; 10ObS255/88; 1Ob31/94; 8ObS2/97w; 8ObA2303/96a; 10ObS165/97f; 10ObS215/97h; 10ObS356/97v; 10ObS279/97w; 10ObS401/97m; 10ObS446/97d; 10ObS304/97x; 10ObS224/98h; 10ObS68/00y; 7Ob80/07a; 7Ob22/09z; 3Ob51/10m; 3Ob71/14h; 7Ob146/15v; 9ObA72/17d; 8ObA47/17w; 6Ob120/18t; 5Ob81/19a; 9Ob23/21d; 8Ob96/21g; 6Ob231/22x; 7Ob103/25k; 7Ob156/25d · OGH · 15. April 2026
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.