Entscheidung
OGH · 1Ob602/52; 2Ob738/53 (2Ob739/53); 3Ob604/53; 2Ob496/54 (2Ob497/54); 2Ob494/54; 1Ob971/54; 1Ob213/56; 6Ob213/58 (6Ob214/58); 1Ob766/53 (1Ob767/53); 2Ob340/61 (2Ob347/61); 5Ob168/63; 7Ob213/63; 1Ob52/64; 7Ob274/65; 4Ob92/66 (4Ob93/66); 1Ob25/69 (1Ob26/69); 2Ob372/68; 5Ob169/71 (5Ob170/71); 1Ob312/71 (1Ob313/71); 5Ob31/73; 6Ob147/75; 5Ob716/82; 1Ob695/84 (1Ob696/84); 5Ob106/15x; 10ObS74/15b · 30. Juli 2015
1Ob602/52; 2Ob738/53 (2Ob739/53); 3Ob604/53; 2Ob496/54 (2Ob497/54); 2Ob494/54; 1Ob971/54; 1Ob213/56; 6Ob213/58 (6Ob214/58); 1Ob766/53 (1Ob767/53); 2Ob340/61 (2Ob347/61); 5Ob168/63; 7Ob213/63; 1Ob52/64; 7Ob274/65; 4Ob92/66 (4Ob93/66); 1Ob25/69 (1Ob26/69); 2Ob372/68; 5Ob169/71 (5Ob170/71); 1Ob312/71 (1Ob313/71); 5Ob31/73; 6Ob147/75; 5Ob716/82; 1Ob695/84 (1Ob696/84); 5Ob106/15x; 10ObS74/15b · OGH · 30. Juli 2015
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.