Entscheidung
OGH · 4Os323/29; 7Os316/60; 11Os3/62 (11Os4/62); 10Os80/63; 4Os140/24; 10Os101/65; 10Os72/74; 10Os101/74; 9Os40/79; 11Os177/80; 13Os162/83 (13Os163/83); 10Os26/84; 13Os30/84; Bkd17/86; 12Os92/87; 15Os23/88 (15Os24/88, 15Os34/88); 13Os126/93 (13Os127/93); 13Os113/97 (13Os114/97); 12Os107/01; 11Os24/03; 13Os107/08x (13Os108/08v, 13Os109/08s, 13Os130/08d); 14Os62/20d (14Os63/20a, 14Os64/20y); 13Os38/22w (13Os53/22a) · 7. September 2022
4Os323/29; 7Os316/60; 11Os3/62 (11Os4/62); 10Os80/63; 4Os140/24; 10Os101/65; 10Os72/74; 10Os101/74; 9Os40/79; 11Os177/80; 13Os162/83 (13Os163/83); 10Os26/84; 13Os30/84; Bkd17/86; 12Os92/87; 15Os23/88 (15Os24/88, 15Os34/88); 13Os126/93 (13Os127/93); 13Os113/97 (13Os114/97); 12Os107/01; 11Os24/03; 13Os107/08x (13Os108/08v, 13Os109/08s, 13Os130/08d); 14Os62/20d (14Os63/20a, 14Os64/20y); 13Os38/22w (13Os53/22a) · OGH · 7. September 2022
Den vollständigen Entscheidungstext findest du im verknüpften RIS-Original.